![]() What makes this game interesting is its rather complex ability to suggest the next move and attempt to solve the game grid. To play, type M-x 5x5, and with an optional digit argument you can change the size of the grid. ![]() The 5x5 game is a logic puzzle: you are given a 5x5 grid with a central cross already filled-in your goal is to fill all the cells by toggling them on and off in the right order to win. And when you exit the Hanoi buffer or type a character you are treated to a sarcastic goodbye message (see above.) 5x5 There are a few Customize options ( M-x customize-group RET hanoi RET) such as enabling colorized discs. The Tower of Hanoi implementation in Emacs dates from the mid 1980s - an awful long time ago indeed. In Emacs there are three commands you can run to trigger the Tower of Hanoi puzzle: M-x hanoi with a default of 3 discs M-x hanoi-unix and M-x hanoi-unix-64 uses the unix timestamp, making a move each second in line with the clock, and with the latter pretending it uses a 64-bit clock. The Tower of Hanoi is an ancient mathematical puzzle game and one that is probably familiar to some of us as it is often used in Computer Science as a teaching aid because of its recursive and iterative solutions. Emacs is Serious Business now in a way that it probably wasn’t back in the 1980s when some of these games were written. What they all have in common is a whimsy and a casualness that I rarely see in Emacs today. The only thing they have in common is that most of them were added a long time ago: some are rather odd inclusions (as you’ll see below) and others were clearly written by bored employees or graduate students. Some you have probably heard of or played before. Why not play Emacs’s Zork-like text adventure game to take your mind off the tedium of work?īut seriously, yes, there are both games and quirky playthings in Emacs. I would recommend anyone curious to give both a try and decide for themselves.It’s yet another Monday and you’re hard at work on those TPS reports for your boss, Lumbergh. I used eglot for a little while before trying lsp-mode and decided that I personally prefer lsp-mode overall, with both being great options. lsp-mode brings in a lot of features and prefers to use third party packages instead of built ins. Eglot is much more minimal and tries to use native emacs features when possible, preferring minimalism over features. I would not say either package is better than the other because they are so different, and have such different philosophies. Another example is using flycheck instead of flymake for on-the-fly diagnostics. An example of such a feature is lsp-mode's project integration, it uses projectile which is much more powerful and useful than the built in project.el. I also feel that lsp-mode's features are higher quality overall, with the downside of depending on packages and features not built into emacs itself. This way I can build in things like support for native compilation, modules (required for vterm) and rip out things I don't want or need like X support, jpeg, png, gif, etc.Īs long as your latency via SSH to the remote host is reasonable, in my opinion this is approach is considerably better than what TRAMP offers in terms of speed and ease of use.Įven if the things you say about lsp-mode are true (which I don't think they are), lsp-mode has many features that eglot has no alternative to at all. I build my own Emacs on these powerful remote hosts which I've automated with some Ansible scripting, because the OS vendor's Emacs packages are almost always a couple revisions behind. * Very nice in-emacs terminal emulation via vterm * Mouse support w/ scroll wheel (xterm-mouse-mode) * Icon(all-the-icons) via alternate non-ascii "icons-in-terminal" font * Hyper key bindings, also bindings like C-., C-, etc Here are some unexpected things I have working with tty Emacs under tmux: It does take some configuration, and it really helps to have a modern terminal emulator (I use iTerm2 on macOS). ![]() ![]() I do lots of development that way every day at work. Yes, Emacs can run very well under tmux on a powerful remote host.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |